|
(notes edited by John McGivering) |
notes on the text |
Kipling’s continued concern for the rest of his life with the mental and nervous effects left by their war experiences upon ex-soldiers and ex-officers ... Eight of the stories are directly concerned with this subject ... His most terrible general evocation of madness, “The Mother’s Son", is used as a preface to one of the least successful of these stories, “Fairy-Kist”.And Andrew Lycett (page 526) notes:
Rudyard makes much of the fact that in his war-blasted state, Wollin was potentially susceptible to any bizarre idea – ‘Jack-the Ripperism’ or religious mania - that he might encounter.J M S Tompkins comments:
The complexity of approach here, and in other tales of the period, has given rise to the supposition that Kipling's control of his form slackened towards the end of his writing life. This is not so; the tales never wander, but the density of the interwoven patterns sometimes baffles the eye. We have to peer as if through lattice work to see Wollin as he sits in his cellar.Philip Mason takes a rather patronising view (page 240), observing that: 'the story begins, for instance, with a piece of mock-pomposity which recalls Plain Tales'. Mason goes on to take exception to the later reference to a picture by 'an artist called Goya' (page 170, line 31), :
'a phrase which is either an insult to the reader or the kind of self-conscious after-dinner joke that is quite out of place at a serious point in the story. It turns back forty years and recalls the complicated attitude of the strangely clever youth, who was always saying ‘I don’t want to seem too clever – but on the other hand I don’t want you to forget how clever I am !’Mason goes on to consider the breaking strain in Wollin and young Tigner; the former after his experiences in the war, and the latter who, feeling that he might have prevented the girl’s death, goes out of his mind, while Wollin recovers.